Sunday, February 26, 2017

Hillbilly Elegy and the Dust Bowl Days: Live and Don't Learn

After finishing a reading of J.D. Vance's Hillbilly Elegy, but before beginning to write these reflections on it, I got into one of my documentary-watching moods and ran across Ken Burns's The Dust Bowl. I am one of the legion of Ken Burns fans, but this one came out at a time when I could not get involved and so on a recent (coincidentally very windy) evening I decided to take it in. However, I wonder if unconsciously I was drawn to it now, not only because of the Trump supporter conundrum, but also because of reflections on my roots.

Both of my parents grew up in Oklahoma near the panhandle (but not in the exact "no man's land" of the documentary but instead to the east and slightly south of it near Woodward).  They did tell me about the Dust Bowl, but as both came from educated, professional families, they were affected more by the Depression in general and were spared the horrors of the worst of the ecological disaster. Then I recalled what my father told me of his family's earlier generations in Appalachia as broadly conceived- northern Alabama. Somehow, farmers became teachers, then pastors, then doctors. And then there was my time in summer camp in Tennessee when I got to know a true hillbilly family slightly when I volunteered to help with the grooming of horses for the day's classes. There were lots of children, little food, and all their savings spent on a one big family event without caution or planning. It all added to my big WHY about what happened to my family that did not to others, what happened to the post-war boom that I have been lucky enough to have lived through, and what is happening now that is causing me not just to disagree with those on the other side of the aisle- in my case I am toward the left and they are toward the right- but to fear for the rejection of our core political assumptions that I thought were shared at the most basic level.

I enjoyed Vance's book even as I experienced astonishment at his emergence from a truly brutal childhood of real dysfunction in his immediate family. However, he communicates very well the role his grandparents played as his real, psychological parents. A similar thing happened to a friend of mine from a rural background. The chaos, lack of connection to literate or any form of what one calls "higher" western culture, violence and collapse of ambition felt harrowing. Vance himself is a study in the interplay of nature and nurture: his raw native and genetic intelligence miraculously won out over his ghastly but all-too-common circumstances. In Tennessee folks described this way were not farmers but miners, hired hands, or available for odd jobs. But even back a few decades, I observed as a privileged teenager that a fierce, admirable honesty existed alongside a strange lack of defined skills, like carpentry, metalwork...as if the old village of the nineteenth-century was populated with people who had sudden amnesia for how to do things. Into this void has come the end of much manual labor, old injuries, opioids, addition and collapse. Learning new skills is not really an option.

I found inspiring the way Vance zeroed in on what his grandmother in particular gave him: she cared. She actually thought learning was important and took the time to communicate this. According to J.D. Vance, this was what was so lacking in his friends and the communities in which he grew up. They did have to go where jobs and survival were, but nothing lasted and despair was common.

Then his narrative took an unexpected turn. He began to look back, after detailing how he aced the SAT and similar exams that no one knew enough to tell him were a big deal, excelled in the US Marine Corps, and then exhausted but educated himself at Ohio State, got into Yale Law, went for a visit home, and found....laziness. While I do not agree with some critiques of his attitude, it did surprise me. The subtitle of this book could be -White is the new Black.

And he has gone on to occupy that right wing side of the aisle. He does blame his poor while culture quite a bit even as he expresses a lot of love for his extended family. Being of the Scots-Irish myself, I can say he is lucky that he was not left as much on his own emotionally as I have been, but regardless of social class we all got a big dose of Calvinism that explains why only some of us are still even asking religious questions. I imagine this comes as a surprise to many readers of his book- the lack of interest in church at least in the Midwest area, as opposed to the South.

Finally, is he in fact explaining anything about Trump supporters? In many ways, yes, insofar as some are like the Dust Bowl farmers. Those former tenant farmers were sold huge tracts of land and told to plow it; they had no way to test it without some education in science and critical thinking, and so the land sharks and hucksters of the Oklahoma land rushes swindled them easily. They knew that wheat could not grow there long-term. And Trump also is nothing more than a con artist; it is the hyper-capitalist elites and fanatics like Steve Bannon who are the real dangers. In other ways, no, Hillbilly Elegy really does not tell us about racism and the onrush of technology that will take away jobs no matter what. I was really fascinated that Vance did not talk about African Americans really or immigrants. I learned from some web research that the wonderful woman he found to marry is of South Asian background- India- and at his website are pictures of their Christian-Hindu wedding! I wish he would send them to the white nationalists, although they would probably just blame Yale. And if the climate-change deniers feel superior to the Dust Bowl farmers, well, they are either just as gullible as the farmers or just as crooked as the land dealers. Anyone want to sell a house to a sub-prime borrower?

Only viable schools, the cultivation of empathy, and true open-minded curiosity can save our larger culture, and maybe that is where the new idealists need to be, like the civil rights advocates of years ago. If J.D. Vance can just cultivate a little more empathy he can contribute. He has some of the other two advantages and found out the "elites" are people, too.

Monday, February 20, 2017

That's Not Sun; it's Rain, and That is the Whitest Black Dress I've Ever Seen (alt-reality)

Over at the Yale Environment 360 (E360) Blog, a January 23, 2017 post by Bill McKibben asks just bluntly if it is already too late, and the dystopia of a damaged planet with no means of reversing the reactive systems in place is just something we have to accept with the election of Trump. He repeats the often-stated bad news that predictions from as far back as 1989 were too conservative and it seems now the pace of climate change has accelerated: "Already, only 17 years into the millennium, the planet is profoundly changed: half the ice missing from the polar north, for instance, which in turn is shifting weather patterns around the globe."

In a post-election panel at Georgetown Law, Vicki Arroyo stated something the Yale post acknowledges as well, namely that it has already been so very hard, and the interests so very much entrenched, that for climate lawyers and scientists pushing harder and harder is what they have always done. Would that hard work and the need to convince others were the whole picture. Instead, there is a new horrific world of Steve Bannon and alternative facts to contend with.

I just learned today that on the campaign trail, Trump actually told drought-stricken Californians that there was no drought.   If the autocrat truly can say that black is white and wet is dry as we experience what is actually happening, we could be truly lost. As Christian Schwägerl wrote in October 2016 for his Yale E360 opinion post on "How the Attack on Science Is Becoming a Global Contagion," there are many recent examples, which he lists, of attacks on science and a resort to pure ideology to create a narrative of opposition between environmental concerns and the nationalism that is growing in the U.S. and Europe.

He does not mention the implications of Trump's attempts to convince some voters in California that a conspiracy to save a small fish created an unnecessary drought, and by implication, destroys jobs, etc). The implications are that there is a narrative that many of us need to counter, and it should be done strategically, pointing out that fisherman have jobs, that some jobs will be lost by environmental destruction, and of course the small fish is not the end of the story but a link in a chain.

If at least the children can learn this science, we may have hope. We will have to contend with De Vos and the whole army of ignorant billionaires, but we must do it. I just refuse to believe it is too late, even if I have to accept the science that we have ushered in a new planetary era.